.

Do Boston Families Even Want Public School?

Low attendance at a city-sponsored meeting sends the wrong signal.

When you’re a member of the audience, you hope to outnumber the performers.  An empty venue is disheartening for those on stage and there’s less energy in the room. 

Boston Public Schools (BPS) took the stage on a rainy Tuesday night, holding its latest community meeting on improving school choice. But with fewer than two dozen people attending, speakers included – we barely made it.

Go ahead, you can yawn – “community meeting on improving school choice” is one boring string of words, and not an event destined to be standing room only. But I was wide-eyed, thinking of the immense task Mayor Thomas Menino created for the city in January, in promising to overhaul the lottery assignment process and begin fostering school communities for 57,000 students and their families across Boston by next year.

Half of the attendees on May 15 were paid to be there: employees of BPS, State Rep. Marty Walz, plus the mayor’s representative, and people from the offices of City Councilors Mike Ross and John Connolly.

That left just a smattering of parents and other interested parties who came to discuss how Boston might improve on the assignment lottery. It was a public meeting open to all, but the location targeted nearby neighborhoods. (Meetings have already been hosted in the downtown neighborhoods by BPS in the South End and Charlestown.) 

A legacy of the painful years of , the school assignment process has been modified several times since it was  implemented in 1988. It’s stressful at best for families new to the system, and not always gives satisfactory results. Last June, Councilor Mike Ross pointed out in a press release that citywide, 76.7 percent of families received one of the school choices they applied for, while for Back Bay and Beacon Hill students the figure was 41.7 percent, “the lowest in the city.”

The current overhaul effort seeks to make families happier by keeping more kids closer to their neighborhood schools, and thus reduce transportation costs, which amount to nearly 10 percent of the city’s $830 million school budget.

Given that more than 700 participants in Boston have already attended these BPS dialogues since March, the process was almost quaint: A patient explanation of how the lottery works was followed by the audience contributing comments for the moderators to write down on large paper tablets. One line of questioning: what makes a quality education, what is equity, what do you want for your children, etc.

Then, in a different exercise, the queries began with, “Do you value school choice? What about choice is important to you?” These leading questions set off a crosscurrent by Shirley Kressel, co-founder of the Alliance of Boston Neighborhoods, and a suspicion of the whole process – 20-odd community meetings held by BPS around the city since March. Ms. Kressel is convinced that the dialogue is only lip service to citizen input and a cover for some predetermined plan.

But “it’s not a done deal,” said Maureen Harris, a former schoolteacher, who currently works in Central Administration for BPS. “We really do care about your voice.”

Mary Ann Crayton, another BPS administrator, strived to keep everyone on task, while trying to provide room for tangents to the agenda. Other than the engaged earnestness of the BPS employees at the meeting, there is a meticulousness to the process that seems to want to prove Ms. Harris’s point: A worksheet and exit survey were collected, and you can read summaries of all the meetings online to see what participants have been thinking.  

 Also online, take a look at a survey which hundreds of families have already completed. Like that survey, part of our exercise at the meeting was ordering a list of priorities for choosing a school: school hours that are convenient, academics that are strong, etc. One mother remarked that “the facility is in good shape” should be a given at any school – not a choice. You could surmise that some of Boston’s 125 public schools must not be inspiring settings in which to learn. 

Another tangent contributed to the discussion by Kressel was how the city would fund all this improvement.

“We are awash in money,” she said, stating that waste is rampant and that “with a dull pencil” we could find all the money needed, even to  build new schools. The “Improving School Choice” initiative alone has a commitment of $400,000 from the Boston Opportunity Agenda – which is public and private money – to be spent on the revamp.

Given that Back Bay and Beacon Hill, as well as the West End, Fenway, and Kenmore have not had neighborhood schools for years, Kressel’s pencil would be useful. In the Back Bay alone, there are between 300 and 400 children aged five to 14, and more than 500 younger kids whose families may inevitably consider leaving the city for more secure school options. A new school option downtown could relieve demand on the schools in Charlestown, the North End, South End, and Chinatown.

Meeting participants also touched on parent involvement and how it can help boost quality education in individual schools, one mother noting that food is a lure that works to increase attendance at any gathering, PTA or otherwise.

The tempting spread of coffee and snacks behind the BPS moderators didn’t draw that many participants to this meeting. Maybe not enough parents knew about it. And granted, because of the mayor's prioritizing of school choice improvements this year, there have been more meetings than ever.

On May 15 alone, John Connolly held a different school assignment meeting on Beacon Hill for constituents in what his office calls "a parallel process." But if more downtown families want public school as an option, the city needs to see that we care enough to fill some more seats when we're invited to the discussion.

jshore May 20, 2012 at 05:57 PM
Part 1 Boston Families have demonstrated the last two years at School Committee Meetings that they want public schools! Their public schools were closed anyway! Shirley Kressel is correct in believing that “the dialogue is only lip service to citizens input and a cover for some predetermined plan.” The BPS does not want the fall-out it experienced the last two years as it closed school after school. The low turnout can be attributed to Boston Parents and Teachers feeling betrayed, and frankly, don’t trust the BPS School Committee, Dr. Johnson or this Assignment Panel. Why should they? The School Committee closed schools that had the strong support of parents and teachers, yet their voice was ignored at the many school committee meetings they attended the past two years! The Emerson School is an example of this. Teachers and Parents disproved the data that BPS presented and fought to keep the school open. School Committee member, John Barros, led the Emerson School Community to believe he was on their side. Emerson Parents and Teachers spent countless hours refuting erroneous information spun by the BPS, pleaded their case at school committee meetings, and gathered neighborhood signatures of support, yet, that school was closed! Dedicated, Emerson teachers were demonized in the press because they were in the excess pool, and Emerson students were dispersed to other schools in the city.
jshore May 20, 2012 at 05:59 PM
Part 2 Then a short time later, that same BPS School Committee member Barros, as part of his non-profit Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative (DSNI), submitted an application, which was approved by the state to open a Horace Mann Charter School in the Emerson Building! Just these past few weeks the DSNI received a “Promise Neighborhoods Planning Grants” for $500,000, which Barros applied for on October 25, 2010! What a conflict of interest, and what a slap in the face to the Parents and Teachers of the Emerson School Community! www2.ed.gov/programs/promiseneighborhoods/2010/narratives/u215p100187.pdf - 2010-10-25
jshore May 20, 2012 at 06:01 PM
Part 3 “The current overhaul effort seeks to make families happier by keeping more kids closer to their neighborhood schools, and thus reduce transportation costs, which amount to nearly 10 percent of the city’s $830 million school budget.” The elephant in the closet that needs to be addressed by the BPS if their intent is to reducing transportation costs is what are they going to do with the 700+ bus drivers who will be without jobs? Many bus drivers are Boston residents who, over the years, have seen our students get to school and home again safely. It is no easy task to keep 50+/- kids, on a stop and go ride throughout the city, day-in and day-out. These bus drivers are part of the Boston Public School Community; we have a moral responsibility to them. If you look at the data of the successful urban schools, the “high-quality teachers” are augmented by in-school support staff, in direct service to students, which makes it possible for those teachers to teach. Boston Public Schools have “high quality” dedicated, veteran teachers, in failing schools, who have worked tirelessly over many years, without results, because the in-school support systems are not in place, because the money is spent on busing.
jshore May 20, 2012 at 06:02 PM
Part 4 So will the BPS step-up and train these soon to be unemployed bus drivers, for BPS in-school support jobs as attendance officers, timeout room monitors, discipline deans, security paraprofessionals, teaching assistants and fresh food chefs in our schools? These positions were eliminated for “lack of funds” caused by busing, and schools spiraled down. Successful school systems have these in-school support positions, why not Boston Public Schools? The money, now allocated for busing, should be directed toward instituting in-school support systems in direct service to students. Eliminating busing, and returning to neighborhood schools, should be a windfall to the Children of Boston not the City of Boston.
Angela Wang May 23, 2012 at 02:54 PM
jshore, thank you very much for making these points. It's small consolation to all the disadvantaged parties in your story, but your speaking up and keeping this information front and center can only help families facing these issues now and in the future.
hongfeng January 07, 2013 at 09:54 AM
http://www.coachoutletonlinebfd.com/ Coach Outlet Online http://www.guccibeltstb.com/ Gucci Belt http://www.coachoutletonlineste.com/ Coach Outlet Store Online http://www.cocoachoutletonline.org/ Coach Odutlet Online http://www.coachoutletonlinetsy.net/ Coach Online Outlet

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something